Essential information on each bill is below. For more details, click on the bill number – e.g., “SB 5000.” The new page will show the progress of the bill, videos of debate, and the link to send a comment to your legislator about the bill.
Bill Summary
Rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled users to easily create or alter images in a realistic manner, resulting in the widespread proliferation of fabricated depictions that are virtually indistinguishable from authentic images. AI and other digital tools are increasingly capable of generating realistic images of minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct. In addition, AI has introduced significant barriers to the detection and prosecution of crimes involving depictions of minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct. Even where a fabricated depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct does not depict an identifiable victim, exposure to such material may nonetheless desensitize the creator and viewers to the sexual exploitation and abuse of minors, distort perceptions of healthy sexuality and relationships, and increase the likelihood of future victimization.
Therefore, the legislature intends to expand Washington’s existing prohibitions against fabricated depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct to include circumstances where the depicted minor is not identifiable. Senate Bill 5094 aims to strengthen protections for children and improve the prosecution of related crimes by amending Washington state law regarding the sexual exploitation of minors. Amendments clarify definitions related to fabricated depictions of minors in sexually explicit content. The bill also alters statutes of limitations for various sex offenses, extending some limitations based on the victim’s age or the time it takes to conclusively identify a suspect through DNA or photographic evidence. The bill aims to strengthen protections for children and improve the prosecution of related crimes.
-
Education
Concerning school districts’ authority to contract indebtedness for school construction.
Bill Summary
This bill expands the authority of school districts to incur debt for school construction and property purchases without requiring voter approval. While it may seem like a practical measure to streamline school funding, it significantly reduces taxpayer oversight and accountability in financial decisions that could lead to long-term fiscal consequences. By allowing school boards to issue bonds and take on debt without direct voter approval, the bill effectively sidelines the voices of the community, who will ultimately bear the financial burden through future taxes. This means that school districts could commit to expensive projects without seeking the input of the taxpayers who will be responsible for repaying the debt. While the bill does require a public hearing before issuing non-voted bonds over $250,000, this is a weak safeguard compared to direct voter approval, as public comment does not equate to real decision-making power.
Moreover, the bill permits school districts to use borrowed funds for broad purposes, including purchasing property and exercising any “powers or duties” they are authorized to have, opening the door to potential misuse of taxpayer money. Without voter oversight, there is little to prevent school boards from making financially irresponsible decisions that lead to higher property taxes or misallocated resources. By removing the essential checks and balances that come with requiring voter approval, this bill prioritizes administrative convenience over fiscal responsibility. Please stand against this bill.
-
Life
Removing references to pregnancy from the model directive form under the natural death act.
Bill Summary
Senate Bill 5096 removes a specific provision related to pregnancy from the model directive form under Washington state’s Natural Death Act. Currently, the form includes language that would nullify the advance directive if the person is diagnosed as pregnant. The bill eliminates this clause, which means a person’s advance healthcare directive will remain valid regardless of pregnancy status. The bill modifies the existing health care directive form by removing the pregnancy-specific language that previously stated the directive would have no force or effect during pregnancy.
Additionally, the bill makes some minor technical adjustments to the lettering of subsequent sections of the form (renumbering sections after removing the pregnancy clause). The changes ensure that individuals can maintain their previously stated healthcare wishes even if they become pregnant, potentially giving patients more control over their medical decisions across different life circumstances. Despite completely different DNA, this bill provides no legal rights for a baby in the womb, regardless of its development stage.
-
Safety
Expanding access to leave and safety accommodations to include workers who are victims of hate crimes or bias incidents.
Bill Summary
Senate Bill 5101, sponsored by Sen. Javier Valdez, D-Seattle and co-sponsored by Sen. Drew Hansen, D-Bainbridge Island, expands the protected categories of current leave benefits for victims of domestic violence to victims of “hate crimes” and/or “bias incidents”.
FPIW does not take issue with victims of domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking taking a leave of absence; however, we do take issue with “hate crimes and/or bias incidents” being added to this list. The leave of absence can be used for “safety planning”, seeking services from shelter or counseling centers, medical treatment or legal proceedings. Supporting documentation for the leave can come from a clergy member, attorney, a medical professional, “other professional” or a hate crimes hotline “advocate”.
The vague definition of a “hate crime or bias incident” will likely lead to potential misuse and legal challenges. Furthermore, this bill has the potential to place even greater administrative and financial burdens on small businesses.
-
Immigration
Expediting review of sentences when there exists a pending deportation proceeding.
Bill Summary
SB 5103 is a misguided attempt to prioritize certain criminal cases based on immigration status rather than fairness and public safety. By creating an expedited process for pardons and clemency in cases involving pending deportation, the bill undermines the integrity of Washington’s justice system. The current system already allows for expedited review in extraordinary cases, making this legislation unnecessary. Prioritizing these cases over others could delay justice for individuals with equally compelling circumstances but without immigration concerns. The WA Senate GOP states: “SB 5103 would prioritize non-citizens in courts, pardons, and commutations ahead of Americans. This is backwards thinking, and it’s insanely out of touch.”
Additionally, the bill does not differentiate between minor and serious offenses, meaning individuals convicted of crimes that threaten public safety could benefit from rushed pardons. It places undue pressure on the Clemency and Pardons Board to fast-track cases that may not have been properly vetted. Washington should focus on policies that ensure fairness and consistency in the criminal justice system, rather than carving out special exceptions based on immigration status. This bill could also create a dangerous precedent by encouraging more policy changes that weaken accountability for criminal convictions. Clemency should be based on individual merit, not on whether a person is facing deportation.